The Rise of the Retreat (Motivation Strategies Magazine)
By Bob Andelman
There are generally common views of retreats.
They’re either a waste of time and money or an invaluable corporate planning tool. Like many trends, the view on retreats tends to rise and fall on an individual company’s finances.
Today, with the national economy holding steady, a recent EIBTM Trends and Market Share report noted a rise in retreats as a trend to watch. The question is, why?
“The EIBTM Industry Trends and Market Share Report has shown a rise in retreats because companies and associations have realized the effectiveness of taking their executives/directors out of the normal working environment for a few days to discuss strategy, future planning and visioning for their organization,” says Rob Davidson, who was in charge of the report. He is also a senior lecturer in business travel and tourism at the University of Westminster in England. “Retreats have been recognized as the best way of focusing on relationship building, team building and brainstorming in an intensive but relaxing manner.”
Bruce Withrow, founder of Toronto-based Meeting Facilitators International, says it’s all about profitable growth.
“The days of performance improvement through cost cutting and restructuring are gone,” Withrow says. “You just can’t shrink your way to greatness. At the same time, senior management teams are facing significant demands on their time and are working longer and harder than ever. Faced with endless demands on their time, it is hard for a senior management team to spend any significant amount of time together as a group planning for the future. Because of this, the management team needs to schedule a block of time where it can work together as a team on the future of the company. This time is the corporate retreat.”
A retreat can be made motivational by cramming as much as possible into the shortest period of time. The right site is vital - one that helps reach the objectives of the retreat: an escape from day-to-day reality into an attractive, calm and inspirational setting. Or one that offers opportunity for exciting and dynamic activities. It depends on the specific goals of the retreat.
For the last six years, Jim Polinsky has been general manager of the Minnesuing Acres executive retreat lodge and meeting center. He says, without equivocation, that there has been a discernible up-tick in the lodge’s business post 9-11.
“Our business is up approximately 20 percent,” according to Polinsky. “We thinks it’s because of the quality of the retreat and sales we’re doing, but there’s also more demand. And the economy – a better economy positively impacts my business.”
The one sure thing about the retreat market is that if your company is looking at eliminating expenses, a retreat to some remote, exotic locale might be the first line cut in a tight budget if its purpose can be accomplished in the office. Team-building activities such as corporate cookery, physical challenges and dogsled racing – all available at Minnesuing, for example – get swept under the rug in a financial pinch.
Polinsky says that, nonetheless, there are things you just can’t get done with daily interruptions such as email, phone calls, office walk-ins, family demands and other things that can get in the way of long-range thinking and critical planning and decision-making.
“When we’re selling our retreat, one of the things that’s great about Minnesuing is exclusivity,” he says. “We do one group at a time. It’s not just about teambuilding but also for building relationships and trust. You have the exclusivity of the lodge and the flexibility of changing your schedule. Having your whole team isolated is a plus. They don’t go to the office or have the distraction of the cell phone or laptop.”
(Minnesuing does have high speed wireless Internet access and even as remote as it is, there are now cell towers to relay mobile phone signals.)
Another plus to getting away from the office is that if you’re having sensitive conversations, a lodge retreat with a controlled guest list means not having to worry about who is listening that shouldn’t.
And if the retreat brings together disparate company or association leaders from across North America or the globe that otherwise would only connect via telephone or email, for two days of intensity, they have the place to themselves.
The nature of a retreat tends to gear it more toward remote locations. The drawback of that is it often means a long drive through unpopulated areas to get there.
“Most of our business comes out of Minneapolis,” Polinsky says. “It’s a two-hour and 45-minute drive from there to here. For a high level executive, they think they could hop in a plane and go to Scottsdale in less time. They’re not used to getting in a car and driving. That’s our biggest challenge.”
One solution might be to put everyone on a bus and drive up together, making it a good time to de-stress, watch a movie and bond more socially.
How can a planner put together a retreat that best meets so many goals?
“There are two different but related groups supporting a retreat,” Withrow says, “meeting planners and meeting facilitators. The planners can ensure flawless logistics that eliminate possible distractions to the management team. They can help select good locations and make sure that the room set-up is conducive to an effective retreat. They can ensure that leisure activities are available and that meal plans fit in with the work day of the group and they can get the team there and back again with a little travel fatigue as possible. Finally they can work with the meeting facilitator as an ally to help them with the planning of the meals, the room layout, the schedule and the agenda. If the company is not planning to use a facilitator they may want to suggest the use of a facilitator. What the facilitator will do is help the company articulate the goals of the retreat and develop a proposal that describes a process that the facilitator will lead to help the company achieve these goals. This frees all of the management team to participate in the retreat and lets a neutral party control the interactions and keep the group on track.”
Regardless of skill it is difficult for someone to be both the facilitator and a participant in the retreat. Without a facilitator in the room the team will lose out in terms of the quality of the participation, or the effectiveness of the facilitation. Finally, the facilitator will take responsibility for documenting the results of the meeting and creating a meeting report summarizing all that was accomplished.
Polinsky offers this additional retreat productivity tip: “I always suggest groups eat later, at 7 or 8 p.m.,” he says. “It’s not like Vegas where there are other entertainment options. It lets you take advantage of daylight better.”
Sidebar: The Goals of the Retreat
Bruce Withrow, founder of Toronto-based Meeting Facilitators International, says that while the goals of a retreat may vary from organization to organization, the fundamental objective is to align the thinking of the team after a process of rigorous discussion and debate.
“Success is probably the best motivator of all,” he says. “A successful retreat is highly motivational. But what makes a successful retreat? That depends on what you set out to accomplish. For many companies, what they want to accomplish is to get some clarity as to what they want to look like in the future and to develop plans for how they are going to accomplish this. We call this a ‘Vision of Success,’ and an action plan. Many companies also want to figure out how they are going to profitably grow, and are willing to do the hard work of evaluating their competitive position, their strengths, their weaknesses, and other related activities like examining who their most attractive customers are, and understanding why they win business when they win and lose business when they lose. What these companies get motivated by is coming up with a strategy that they are convinced is going to help them win.”
The following are common issues around which Withrow says organizations taking a retreat typically want to get alignment:
• What will we look like in X years if we have been successful?
• What barriers are getting in the way of success and how are we going to overcome them?
• How can we profitably grow?
• What is happening in the environment, politically, economically, socially, and technologically that is going to effect our future success?
• What are our real strengths? What are our weaknesses that we want to address?
• Why do we win business when we win, and lose when we lose?
• Who are our most attractive customers and why?
• What does the competitive landscape look like?
• What does the competitive ladder look like?
• Where are we on the ladder and how can we move up the ladder?
• What might the competition do that will hurt us?
Labels: Bruce Withrow, EIBTM Trends and Market Share report, Jim Polinsky, Meeting Facilitators International, Minnesuing, Rob Davidson

